The structured record of how AI is being governed across every jurisdiction that matters — built for compliance teams, legal practices, regulators and institutional analysts who need machine-readable intelligence, not narrative news.
Plans and licensing See live data ↓| Jurisdiction | Posture | Binding instrument | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| EU | Hardening | AI Act — Art. 50 transparency from 2 Aug 2026; high-risk from 2 Dec 2027 (Annex III) and 2 Aug 2028 (Annex I) · 7-layer tracker | Confirmed |
| USA | Voluntary | Exec order (Jun 2026) + state laws: CO·ADMT, TX·TRAIGA, WA, NY, IL | Confirmed |
| UK | Pro-innovation | Sectoral, no horizontal Act | Probable |
| China | Binding | Algorithm / GenAI rules in force | Confirmed |
Multi-market obligations, citeable developments, and the EU AI Act 7-layer enforcement state. Art. 50 transparency applies from 2 August 2026 (grace to 2 December 2026 for marking by systems already on the market). High-risk obligations apply from 2 December 2027 (Annex III) and 2 August 2028 (Annex I), as amended by the Digital Omnibus.
Cross-jurisdiction comparison and divergence tracking — how your framework sits against peers, with named evidence gaps published.
Compute and model concentration, frontier-lab posture shifts, and a governance-health composite tracked week over week.
All emitted by the engine — not hand-written.
AI Monitor is offered at Reader level. Reader pricing will be published here when billing opens.
Launching open and free. No billing starts until the risk map, lab matrix and export show real data or an honest pending state, and readers get at least 60 days' notice before the first charge. Short extracts may be quoted with attribution and a link.